Cycleops Magneto Vs Fluid 2

We all love riding a bicycle, but what should we do in the off season? Well, do not slack off! If you do not want to lose your edge and power, you should continue training. A basic trainer already makes an excellent way to keep your legs trained during the winter or whenever you can’t really ride a real bike. Below, we will discuss the comparisons between two mid-range trainers from Cycleops, which are Cycleops Magneto vs Fluid 2.

Price
Cycleops Magneto is the lower class model of the two options. This trainer is available at a lower price point, so it can be your choice if you have a very limited budget. You can get it with less than three hundred dollars.

Meanwhile, Cycleops Fluid 2 is a higher class model. It is more expensive, although the price gap is not very dramatic. You need a budget between $300 – $400 for this trainer. It is a nice choice if you don’t mind to spend some extra bucks. (Read also: Cycleops Fluid 2 Vs Jet Fluid Pro)

Resistance Unit
So, both Cycleops Magneto and Cycleops Fluid 2 are rear wheel-on trainers. Why is the price difference? It is because the Magneto model is equipped with an older technology, whereas the Fluid 2 comes with a more refined resistance unit.

Cycleops Magneto features a progressive resistance curve that is provided by a progressive magnetic resistance unit. This mechanism is indeed cheaper. It is less durable, and it tends to work relatively more roughly.

On the other hand, Cycleops Fluid 2 features a fluid resistance unit which also provides a progressive resistance curve. This is a more refined mechanism which offers improved performance and durability. It works more smoothly, and the reduced friction can help it to last for a longer time.

Performance
How does the performance of Cycleops Magneto vs Fluid 2 compare? If you are looking for the smoothest and quietest rear wheel-on trainer, Cycleops Fluid 2 should be your choice. It is noticeably smoother and quieter than the more budget-friendly version.

Cycleops Magneto has a decibel rating of 66 – 68 dB when paddled at 20 mph. On the other hand, Cycleops Fluid 2 offers a more pleasant performance with a decibel rating of 64 – 68 dB when working at the same speed. You can actually feel the difference. It definitely feels smoother.

Other Features
Both Cycleops Magneto and Cycleops Fluid 2 are compatible with 142×12 thru-axle and 148×12 thru-axle, as well as with 20” and 24” wheels. However, you need to install the suitable adapter in order to pair your trainer with the thru-axle or wheel. Both of these two models can also be paired with a cycling power meter or speed/cadence sensor to work with virtual training programs.

Cycleops Magneto Vs Fluid 2

Cycleops MagnetoCycleops Fluid 2
BrandCycleOpsCycleOps
Features– Trainer is a great way to keep your legs in tip-top condition during the off season – Magnetic trainer features progressive resistance – Power band technology offers a wide resistance range Includes a training DVD– Made from rugged 2-inch round 16-gauge steel – Comes with a lifetime warranty from cycleOps – Adjustable footpads for a stable ride on most surfaces – Built with 100% recyclable, non-rusting materials
Price
Ratings*3.6 out of 5.0 stars4.4 out of 5.0 stars
Best deal*Save Money Please click hereSave Money Please click here

NOTE : Product prices, availability, ratings and save money information are accurate as of the date/time indicated on post time (as seen right bellow the tittle) and are subject to change. Any price, ratings, availability and save money information displayed on Amazon Site at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

Conclusion

If you don’t mind spending more bucks for a smoother and quieter performance, Cycleops Fluid 2 is the way to go. It features a fluid resistance unit for better, more comfortable performance. Otherwise, if you prefer to save some money, Cycleops Magneto would do. Both can be paired with additional sensors for working with virtual training programs.

Click Here to Leave a Comment Below 0 comments

Leave a Reply: